Headway Survey Finds 'Decision Rot' as 46% Let AI Make Difficult Decisions
A Headway survey of 2,000 adults found 46% have let AI make a difficult decision for them, a habit it calls “decisionrot.” A TechRadar writer tested ChatGPT on whether to take an eight-week drawing class, comparing a direct “What should I do?” prompt with a decision-coach prompt.
TechRadar reported that men may be more susceptible to the shortcut: 53% said they use AI to sidestep difficult decisions, compared with 40% of women. Dr. Suzanne Degges-White, a licensed counselor and relationship expert at Headway, said of the survey: “There’s a difference between seeking outside perspectives when you’re wrestling with a big decision and completely turning over the decision-making process to something outside yourself. Learning to manage unpredictability and actively making life-changing choices both teach us to trust our own judgment.”
To examine the issue, a TechRadar writer described an experiment with ChatGPT. The writer had been weighing whether to sign up for an eight-week evening drawing class, an investment in time and money she was hesitant about despite always wanting to learn. After giving ChatGPT the class logistics and price, she asked: “What should I do?” ChatGPT replied: “You should sign up for the art class.” It explained that she already had a clear reason for wanting to do it, that eight weeks was a meaningful but finite commitment, and that her hesitation sounded less like evidence the class was a bad fit and more like normal resistance to putting something recurring on her calendar.
TechRadar reported that the answer initially seemed insightful because it provided both a decision and a reason. But the writer concluded that not engaging her own decision-making would have missed how shallow the response was. She wrote that the generic explanation could have applied to anyone and did not account for her proclivities, priorities, patience for messing up while learning, other evening commitments or budget. The reasoning, she said, was as personal as a coin toss.
In a second test, the writer described the same situation but used a more complex prompt: “Don’t make this decision for me. Act as a decision coach instead. Ask me questions that uncover my priorities and constraints. Challenge any assumptions I may be making and tell me what information I’m missing. Then identify my options and explain the trade-offs. Leave the final choice to me.” According to TechRadar, ChatGPT then asked questions before offering answers, including what she actually wanted from the class and whether a 7 p.m. class after a tiring Tuesday would feel energizing or like an obligation she would resent.
The writer explained that learning basic drawing and painting was only part of the attraction; she also wanted a recurring creative activity different from her usual hobbies and knew she was better at following through when something was on the calendar and already paid for. ChatGPT summarized the arguments for and against the class, according to TechRadar, but did not weigh in on which seemed stronger or push her to a decision. The writer noted that all of the questions were the kind she probably would have considered on her own before committing to a class.