BottleCap AI Releases ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B, Cutting Thinking Tokens 37.2% at 0.86pp Accuracy Cost
BottleCap AI has released ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B, a fine-tune of Qwen3.8-27B that cuts average thinking tokens by 37.2% across 12 benchmarks at a 0.86 percentage-point macro-average accuracy cost, with drop-in deployment builds and a gated license.
The model's main benchmark numbers use reasoning_effort=xhigh, the chat template default. Every benchmark gets shorter, with cuts ranging from 10.7% to 65.5%. Knowledge and multilingual tasks shrink most: MMMLU drops 65.5%, from 1,656 to 571 tokens, and MMLU-Pro drops 57.3%. GPQA-Diamond falls from 12,772 to 7,267 tokens, a 43.1% cut. IFBench thinks 46.4% less with accuracy nearly flat, from 79.75% to 79.71%.
Long-context retrieval improves. AA-LCR accuracy rises 2.25 percentage points, from 81.75% to 84.00%, with 38.6% fewer thinking tokens. LiveCodeBench v6 edges up 0.07 percentage points while thinking 20.3% less. Agentic results hold close to the base: τ²-bench gives up 1.01 percentage points for a 30.9% cut, and Terminal-Bench 2.1 loses 0.56 percentage points, inside its ±4.26 interval, for a 10.7% cut. The most expensive trade is AIME 2026, where accuracy falls 3.85 percentage points, from 98.13% to 94.27%, for 30.2% less thinking.
The 37.2% figure is the mean of the 12 per-benchmark reductions, BottleCap said. Pooled mean thinking tokens fall from 15,735 to 12,144. Under a 16K-token cap per response, ThinkingCap scores higher than the base model; truncated traces fall from 0.51% to 0.34%, and looping falls from 0.06% to 0.05%.
Qwen3.8-27B exposes a reasoning-effort setting, and BottleCap says compression stacks with it. Deltas compared with the base model at xhigh, averaged over 11 benchmarks, show that at medium the base cuts 52.1% of thinking for a 9.16 percentage-point loss, while ThinkingCap cuts 60.2% for a 9.90-point loss. At low, the base cuts 55.4% for a 9.71-point loss, versus 62.3% and 10.79 points for ThinkingCap. With thinking off, ThinkingCap trails the base by 5.7 percentage points. BottleCap recommends xhigh for the best accuracy-to-token balance and says individual thinking modes will get attention in a future release.
The evaluation ran both models through the same harness on one NVIDIA H200 with vLLM 0.29.0. Sampling was identical: temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 and min_p 0.0. Multi-seed accuracy is the mean with a 95% interval, with seeds ranging from 32 on AIME 2026 to 1 on MMLU-Pro and MMMLU. MMMLU uses a fixed 10,000-question sample, while the other 11 benchmarks run complete sets. MTP speculative decoding with three draft tokens was measured as accuracy-neutral on AIME 2026, accepting 53% of drafted tokens, about 2.6 tokens per step, matching the base model.
The bf16 checkpoint has 28 billion parameters and accepts image and text input. BottleCap publishes five quantized builds: FP8 at 31 GB for vLLM on Hopper and Blackwell; NVFP4 weight-only at 21 GB for vLLM on Hopper with the Marlin kernel and on Blackwell; NVFP4 W4A4 (AWQ) at 23 GB for Blackwell only; GGUF at 16 to 55 GB for llama.cpp, LM Studio and Ollama; and MLX 4-bit DWQ at 21 GB for Apple Silicon Macs with 32 GB. Serving uses the base model's recipe, with --reasoning-parser qwen3 and the qwen3_xml tool-call parser on vLLM, and thinking returns in a separate reasoning field.
The license is PolyForm Small Business 1.0.0 plus a BottleCap personal-use grant, while upstream Qwen materials remain under Apache-2.0. The repository is gated, and commercial use beyond the small-business license requires a BottleCap agreement. Hugging Face lists no inference provider hosting the model yet. It drops in for Qwen3.8-27B on vLLM or SGLang, BottleCap said.
Editor's Summary BottleCap AI's ThinkingCap-Qwen3.8-27B reduces average thinking tokens by 37.2% across 12 benchmarks at a 0.86 percentage-point macro-average accuracy cost, with the largest accuracy loss on AIME 2026 and a gain on long-context AA-LCR. The model is a gated, drop-in fine-tune of Qwen3.8-27B with multiple quantized deployment builds, but commercial use beyond a small-business license requires a separate agreement.