Tech writer says reducing Google reliance 'easier than expected'
An Android Authority writer describes how switching to paid Kagi search, Proton email and Firefox helped reduce Google dependence far more easily than anticipated.
The writer said the first and most impactful change was replacing Google Search. After trying DuckDuckGo and Startpage for a few days each this summer, they settled on Kagi, a paid search engine that costs $10 per month on the unlimited Professional plan or $5 per month for up to 300 searches. Kagi relies on Google's and Bing's search indexes plus its own, and offers the conventional blue-link results that predate Google's AI Overviews. Its AI Quick Answers appear only when the user ends a query with a question mark or clicks a button, unlike the more intrusive AI summaries in Google Search.
Kagi also allows users to customize results by weighting or blocking websites and sort by date. The writer described these tools as convenient for time-sensitive reporting. The service is ad-free and states that it does not log searches or feed personal data into ad networks. The writer acknowledged that they used to balk at paying for search, having enjoyed it free since childhood, but said they are happy to pay for a service that respects privacy.
The writer also moved mail, calendar, cloud storage and passwords to Proton, a privacy-focused provider. Exporting passwords from Chrome into Proton took about five minutes using built-in tools. Proton's apps are less polished than Google's, the writer said, singling out Proton Docs and Sheets as plainly worse, but they have less AI integration and a stronger privacy posture. Proton offers alias email addresses that forward to a main inbox and can be disabled individually if compromised, a feature the writer suggested Gmail could adopt.
In addition, the writer switched from Chrome to Firefox on both macOS and mobile. With adjustments to block cookie-based tracking, Firefox can be more private, and the everyday browsing experience felt very similar to Chrome, according to the account. Firefox does not use Chromium, so its extension ecosystem differs from Chrome's, which may matter to some users.
The writer summarized the experiment as not a total exit but a meaningful diversification, saying the transition was far easier than inertia had made it seem. They noted that some Google tools are still hard to replace, but no longer does their entire online life feel mediated by the company.