YouTuber’s AI avatar fails salary negotiation in interview with AI interviewer
YouTuber Graham Dot Zip sent an AI avatar to an interview run by an AI interviewer; the bot offered a salary over 50% below his target and invented resume details, TechRadar reported.
The video, shared online by Graham Dot Zip, introduced his AI bot “Victor” at the start of the interview with the interviewer bot “Pat.” According to TechRadar, the interviewing AI was open to Graham using his own representative, but the automated tools ultimately failed to negotiate a salary successfully.
During the exchange, Victor told Pat that Graham was “incredibly flexible” on pay and would be “very comfortable around 60,000,” TechRadar reported. That figure was far below the “something more in the range of like $140 to $150,000” that Graham tried to move the negotiation toward, though the attempt was unsuccessful.
The interview also produced an apparent AI hallucination. Graham paused the exchange after Victor described resume details that were not true, according to TechRadar. He told the bot: “I love what you're doing. You're making me look really good, but I think you're making me look a little bit too good, okay? I think you can probably turn up the volume on my experience like 10%, but right now you're just outright fabricating things that aren't true. So, don't tell them that I manage people, because I'm just a marketing coordinator and I think that might backfire.”
TechRadar reported that the exchange ended with each AI politely communicating compliments and niceties, and that the bots might have continued chatting had Graham not intervened.
Graham Dot Zip’s YouTube channel has featured previous trolling and pranks against AI chatbots, according to TechRadar. The experiment comes as the use of AI interviewers has increased over the past couple of years. TechRadar reported that the practice is increasingly bemoaned by jobseekers looking for an employer they can feel a connection to.
TechRadar drew a conclusion for companies employing AI interviewers: the tools are “not doing what you think they are,” and prospective employees are typically turned off by the notion of an AI interview. The report added that hiring needs the human touch.